CHENNAI: The Madras High Court on Tuesday upheld the age, money, and advertisement restrictions, as well as the night ban imposed by the Tamil Nadu govt on playing online real money games like rummy and poker.
“In true essence, the online real money games is a trade activity, which if left unregulated has immediate implications on health of the public,” a division bench of Justice S M Subramaniam and Justice K Rajasekar said.
The bench made the observation while dismissing a batch of petitions moved by online gaming platforms challenging the validity of the restrictions.
Refusing to concur with the platforms which contended that a state govt lacks power to bring in such restrictions, the court said, “Both the union and state govts have power to enact laws in their own respective subject matter apart from the common pool as enabled in List III (Concurrent list).” This court cannot hold that state is barred from enacting laws regulating online real money games. It is covered under the subject matter of public health and sanitation which comes under List II (State list), the judges said.
The argument that Information Technology Rules, 2021 already prescribe a regulatory framework for intermediaries, including online gaming platforms, and hence the state cannot frame a subordinate legislation is unacceptable, the court said.
“This court views that the state is fully within its competence to enact laws pertaining to online real money games. This court on perusal of the provisions of the act (state legislation) finds no contradictions or provisions that run contrary to the central rules in force,” the bench said.
Moreover, the provisions related to online gaming under IT Rules, 2021 is yet to take effect and remains unenforceable as of today. So there exists a vacuum in regulating online games, the court pointed out. The judges added that they are of the view that the state govt has rightfully taken adequate steps to fill in the vacuum by framing the legislation. Real money games do not seem to possess the level of discipline or professionalism followed while playing such games physically, they added.
Rejecting the argument that mandatory Aadhar verification violates the privacy of a player, the bench said, “Right to privacy carries with it its own limitations and cannot be claimed in absolute. When put on a scale, a compelling public interest outweighs right to privacy.”
“In true essence, the online real money games is a trade activity, which if left unregulated has immediate implications on health of the public,” a division bench of Justice S M Subramaniam and Justice K Rajasekar said.
The bench made the observation while dismissing a batch of petitions moved by online gaming platforms challenging the validity of the restrictions.
Refusing to concur with the platforms which contended that a state govt lacks power to bring in such restrictions, the court said, “Both the union and state govts have power to enact laws in their own respective subject matter apart from the common pool as enabled in List III (Concurrent list).” This court cannot hold that state is barred from enacting laws regulating online real money games. It is covered under the subject matter of public health and sanitation which comes under List II (State list), the judges said.
The argument that Information Technology Rules, 2021 already prescribe a regulatory framework for intermediaries, including online gaming platforms, and hence the state cannot frame a subordinate legislation is unacceptable, the court said.
“This court views that the state is fully within its competence to enact laws pertaining to online real money games. This court on perusal of the provisions of the act (state legislation) finds no contradictions or provisions that run contrary to the central rules in force,” the bench said.
Moreover, the provisions related to online gaming under IT Rules, 2021 is yet to take effect and remains unenforceable as of today. So there exists a vacuum in regulating online games, the court pointed out. The judges added that they are of the view that the state govt has rightfully taken adequate steps to fill in the vacuum by framing the legislation. Real money games do not seem to possess the level of discipline or professionalism followed while playing such games physically, they added.
Rejecting the argument that mandatory Aadhar verification violates the privacy of a player, the bench said, “Right to privacy carries with it its own limitations and cannot be claimed in absolute. When put on a scale, a compelling public interest outweighs right to privacy.”
You may also like
PM Modi marks Environment Day; plants Sindoor at residence - watch video
'I'm saving 10 years on my mortgage thanks to shopping app I use at Tesco, Morrisons, M&S'
CSIR NET June 2025: Notification for CSIR NET June exam released, registration also started; Apply now from here..
Only painting Mahatma Gandhi sat for to be auctioned at Bonhams in UK
JAC 12th Arts Result 2025: Waiting for Jharkhand Board 12th Arts Faculty Result; Know easy ways to check..
